* FAQ    * Search  * Register * Login 
Active topics
Unanswered topics

All times are UTC-06:00



Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: anyone know where i can download old kali versions?
PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2004 2:50 am 
Offline
DBB Fleet Admiral
DBB Fleet Admiral
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 17, 2000 2:01 am
Posts: 2506
Location: Clinton, Ohio
anyone?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2004 6:02 am 
Offline
DBB Benefactor
DBB Benefactor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 1999 2:01 am
Posts: 4193
ICQ: 6955979
Website: http://bubbalou.event3dstudios.com
Location: Dallas Texas USA
why?

ftp://ftp.xgamers.com/pub/kali/
ftp://ftp.charm.net/pub/kali/


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2004 10:56 am 
Offline
DBB Material Defender
DBB Material Defender
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 09, 1999 2:01 am
Posts: 4924
Location: Moorhead, MN
All old versions except for 1.68 are disabled. I will NEVER downgrade from 1.68 to 2.x.

Yes, thats right, 2.x is a downgrade from 1.68 :P


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:28 pm 
Offline
DBB Master
DBB Master
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 28, 1999 2:01 am
Posts: 5426
ICQ: 28874658
Website: http://www.povterminal.net/
Location: Bellevue, WA
Yeah, it's an absolute hog of CPU resources in comparison. These days it's not a big deal, of course, since Kali 2 was released in the days of Pentium IIs I think; but there isn't a whole lot in Kali 2.x that is actually useful and not in earlier releases.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:54 pm 
Offline
DBB Master
DBB Master
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 28, 1999 2:01 am
Posts: 5426
ICQ: 28874658
Website: http://www.povterminal.net/
Location: Bellevue, WA
And in a new wacky twist, just for the hell of it I started up Kali 2.613 today and watched people cycling in and out of chat (or more accurately, me cycling in and out of chat). And I noticed something; certain users never DID seem to drop out, and absolutely all of those were either using 1.68 or GtK or a weird thing called xkali (I think), whatever that is.

It seems, at least from my end, that those people don't have a problem with my buggy router.

Which is weird; it seems to indicate 1.68 is more compatible with 2.x than 2.x is.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 31, 2004 8:18 pm 
Offline
DBB Material Defender
DBB Material Defender
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 09, 1999 2:01 am
Posts: 4924
Location: Moorhead, MN
Its because 2.x has a fruity net protocol which is barely compatible with the traditional kali net protocol. Also, xkali is the newest linux version of kali, written by a lot of the pserv people I think, because a lot of them use linux instead of windows. From what I hear its a lot more friendly to users behind nat.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 1:17 am 
Offline
DBB Master
DBB Master
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 28, 1999 2:01 am
Posts: 5426
ICQ: 28874658
Website: http://www.povterminal.net/
Location: Bellevue, WA
Hm. Might have to try it, since I actually have Linux... although I don't use it very often.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 6:15 am 
Offline
DBB Benefactor
DBB Benefactor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 1999 2:01 am
Posts: 4193
ICQ: 6955979
Website: http://bubbalou.event3dstudios.com
Location: Dallas Texas USA
I have absolutely no problems with Kali 2.x and above with multiple computers behind a router. Given the fact when I had 1.68 and had initially set up a router for broadband, NETGEAR ROUTER was the problem not KALI.

Dumped that router within 2 hours and replaced it with a LINKSYS (never a problem since).

This was about 10 minutes after seeing at the Netgear Website **There is a problem with Netgear routers and GAMING software and GAMING applications** we are working on the Soulution with Netgears NAT translation services** (took them 4 years)

WTF GAMER with GAMING router Problems?? NFW! RMA RTN OMFW... keys please GONE~!

KALI would flame you because your port numbers would change every minute or so behind the netgear router thinking you had mutiple users with the same serial

PS static IP's behind the router make things easier too!


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 4:28 pm 
Offline
DBB Defender
DBB Defender
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2002 3:01 am
Posts: 3399
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Yeah bubba, I had the same problem with a D-Link router and 3 computers networked using Kali. Switched to a linksys and haven't had any trouble since as well.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 04, 2004 6:51 pm 
Offline
DBB Captain
DBB Captain

Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2000 3:01 am
Posts: 770
ICQ: 28764031
Website: http://www.povterminal.net/gallery
Yahoo Messenger: shadow_hoof
AOL: Aether+Stallion
Location: Waikare, New Zealand
I'll be damned if I'm switching routers just to get Kali to work. I'd rather go and find another game.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 04, 2004 7:05 pm 
Offline
DBB Stoner
DBB Stoner
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 20, 1998 3:01 am
Posts: 14329
I had a DLink netcard burn out on me once, so I took that as a sign of how good DLink's quality is.

needless to say I'm running realtek nic's and a linksys DSL modem


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC-06:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  



Descent'rs have piloted these pages
 
The layout and contents contained within this site are © DescentBB.net 1997-2006.
Descent, Descent II are © Parallax Software Corporation.
Descent III is Outrage Entertainment.
Descent is a Trademark of Interplay Productions.

Miner Wars™ is trademark of Keen Software House s. r. o.
.


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group