NASA, money well spent...

For discussion of life's issues: current events, social trends and personal opinions.

Moderators: Tunnelcat, Jeff250

Post Reply
User avatar
Nightshade
DBB Master
DBB Master
Posts: 5138
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2001 2:01 am
Location: Planet Earth, USA
Contact:

NASA, money well spent...

Post by Nightshade »

It bugs me when people say NASA is wasted money when you see things like this:

http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2008/0 ... _mark.html

Places you will never be or see in person but brought to you in ever clearer and amazing photography by NASA.
.
"Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun" - Mao Zedong
User avatar
Testiculese
DBB Material Defender
DBB Material Defender
Posts: 4688
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2001 3:01 am

Post by Testiculese »

Fantastic shots! They said they had a good camera onboard...

I can't believe 4 years has gone by already.

NASA never wastes money (well, in context). Everything they do progresses the population, in a semi-trickle-down effect. We wouldn't have half the technology available to us, the public, if it weren't for NASA missions. The people who think NASA is a waste still believe the Earth is 6000 years old.
User avatar
Foil
DBB Material Defender
DBB Material Defender
Posts: 4900
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Denver, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Post by Foil »

Agreed. The stuff NASA does to forward science and technology is just amazing. The fact that they do it on a budget which gets tighter and tighter every few years is just incredible.
User avatar
CDN_Merlin
DBB_Master
DBB_Master
Posts: 9757
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
Location: Capital Of Canada

Post by CDN_Merlin »

I support any type of scientific work. It's the future.
User avatar
TIGERassault
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1600
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 3:33 pm

Post by TIGERassault »

The one thing about these kind of images is, like Will Wright said, they're still, 2D images. You don't get to see them moving naturally, or how far away they are, or how often you get to see them. It's why I'm more interested in 3D digital recreations than 2D real images.
User avatar
Foil
DBB Material Defender
DBB Material Defender
Posts: 4900
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Denver, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Post by Foil »

They can't do 3D recreations without images of the original.
User avatar
Sergeant Thorne
DBB Material Defender
DBB Material Defender
Posts: 4640
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Indiana, U.S.A.

Post by Sergeant Thorne »

We want video! ;)

Those are amazing pictures. Thanks for the link.
User avatar
Floyd
DBB Captain
DBB Captain
Posts: 561
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 2:01 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re:

Post by Floyd »

TIGERassault wrote:The one thing about these kind of images is, like Will Wright said, they're still, 2D images. You don't get to see them moving naturally, or how far away they are, or how often you get to see them. It's why I'm more interested in 3D digital recreations than 2D real images.
i assume it to be pretty difficult to achive proper 3D-images (or animations for that matter) in that timescale at the currently possible velocities, given the dimensions of the universe. object distance, viewpoint, angular velocity->track velocity, etc. you do the math ;)

on the other hand, i can see moving rocks here on earth, too.
User avatar
TIGERassault
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1600
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 3:33 pm

Re:

Post by TIGERassault »

Foil wrote:They can't do 3D recreations without images of the original.
Good point.
Floyd wrote:i assume it to be pretty difficult to achive proper 3D-images (or animations for that matter) in that timescale at the currently possible velocities, given the dimensions of the universe. object distance, viewpoint, angular velocity->track velocity, etc. you do the math ;)
Actually, I was thinking more along the lines of generated planets and planet landscapes than to do actual planets in the solar system.

I guess you'd have my obsession with Spore to blame for all that. Ever since I could properly comprehend the sheer magnitude of the universe that's generated in that game, I've lost some interest in much simpler things like these images.
Dedman
DBB Material Defender
DBB Material Defender
Posts: 4513
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 2:01 am
Location: Atlanta

Post by Dedman »

Those are awesome. Thanks TB. Has anyone else been watching \"When we left earth\" on the Discovery Chanel? It's on Sunday nights at 2100. Really great shoe.
User avatar
Dakatsu
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1575
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 12:22 am
Location: St. Petersburg, Florida

Re: NASA, money well spent...

Post by Dakatsu »

ThunderBunny wrote:It bugs me when people say NASA is wasted money when you see things like this:

http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2008/0 ... _mark.html

Places you will never be or see in person but brought to you in ever clearer and amazing photography by NASA.
Tru' dat!
CDN_Merlin wrote:I support any type of scientific work. It's the future.
Tru' dat!

People who think NASA wastes money should have bricks chucked at them :P
Gooberman
DBB Alumni
DBB Alumni
Posts: 6155
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 1999 3:01 am
Location: tempe Az

Post by Gooberman »

TIGERassault wrote:I guess you'd have my obsession with Spore to blame for all that. Ever since I could properly comprehend the sheer magnitude of the universe that's generated in that game, I've lost some interest in much simpler things like these images.
With all due respect, I am in awe.
User avatar
Kyouryuu
DBB Alumni
DBB Alumni
Posts: 5775
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 1999 2:01 am
Location: Isla Nublar
Contact:

Re:

Post by Kyouryuu »

Foil wrote:Agreed. The stuff NASA does to forward science and technology is just amazing. The fact that they do it on a budget which gets tighter and tighter every few years is just incredible.
When you think about it, the fact that we got to the moon on 1960s technology makes the accomplishment even more awe-inspiring.
User avatar
Sergeant Thorne
DBB Material Defender
DBB Material Defender
Posts: 4640
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Indiana, U.S.A.

Re:

Post by Sergeant Thorne »

Gooberman wrote:
TIGERassault wrote:I guess you'd have my obsession with Spore to blame for all that. Ever since I could properly comprehend the sheer magnitude of the universe that's generated in that game, I've lost some interest in much simpler things like these images.
With all due respect, I am in awe.
Hehe, me too.
User avatar
woodchip
DBB Benefactor
DBB Benefactor
Posts: 17694
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 1999 2:01 am

Post by woodchip »

European space cameras are pretty good too. Link is to a photo gallery. Scroll through index and look at some of the Mars images:

http://tinyurl.com/4xwcee
User avatar
Tunnelcat
DBB Grand Master
DBB Grand Master
Posts: 13360
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 12:32 pm
Location: Pacific Northwest, U.S.A.

Post by Tunnelcat »

Discovery HD Channel has been running a series called 'When We Left Earth' and has been showing hi-def NASA film footage from the moon walks and the runup to them. First time I've seen these films in such good clarity. Nice, especially the Saturn Rocket liftoffs, the moon flyovers at low orbit, the moon Rover running around, the Lunar Lander liftoffs from the moon from a camera ON the moon, and the Sky Lab Station. Maybe they'll repeat it. I think this weekend they're showing the Shuttle program.
User avatar
TIGERassault
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1600
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 3:33 pm

Post by TIGERassault »

Saay, on a related matter, hows the space station coming along? I haven't been paying enough interest to it recently.
User avatar
Spidey
DBB Grand Master
DBB Grand Master
Posts: 10725
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2001 2:01 am
Location: Earth

Post by Spidey »

The ISS is a POS, and should be scuttled! :wink:
User avatar
Kyouryuu
DBB Alumni
DBB Alumni
Posts: 5775
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 1999 2:01 am
Location: Isla Nublar
Contact:

Re:

Post by Kyouryuu »

Spidey wrote:The ISS is a POS, and should be scuttled! :wink:
I don't know, I kind of agree with that. I don't understand why we didn't build a moon base instead. I have to believe that in the far off future, we'd be interested in colonizing planets. The ISS is like a houseboat. :P
User avatar
Floyd
DBB Captain
DBB Captain
Posts: 561
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 2:01 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re:

Post by Floyd »

Kyouryuu wrote:The ISS is like a houseboat. :P
... which is a habitat in space to conduct experiments that might come in handy when space colonization begins. it's cheap in comparison to a moon base (which is all that counts these days). it's closer and therefore faster to reach in an emergency case. it's an experiment itself as to living in space, which is necessary to endure the longer trips to mars. every little detail they learn in earth orbit helps future endeavours. i say it's a good thing.
User avatar
TIGERassault
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1600
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 3:33 pm

Re:

Post by TIGERassault »

Kyouryuu wrote:I don't know, I kind of agree with that. I don't understand why we didn't build a moon base instead. I have to believe that in the far off future, we'd be interested in colonizing planets. The ISS is like a houseboat. :P
For one thing, the surface of the moon isn't zero gravity. One of the biggest reasons the ISS is being constructed is because many experiments and such require a zero gravity condition, which could only be conducted in a space station or shuttle (which is what those astronauts do in their spare time).
User avatar
Spidey
DBB Grand Master
DBB Grand Master
Posts: 10725
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2001 2:01 am
Location: Earth

Post by Spidey »

BTW the reason I say what I do about the ISS is…have you seen the inside of that thing, it’s a mess ever since the power trouble that took out the computers that time, and is jury rigged with a crapload of laptops…I had to laugh the last time I seen pictures. Also the Russians gave us the shaft, in regards to that thing, leaving most of the expensive stuff to us.
Kiran
DBB Captain
DBB Captain
Posts: 725
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:15 pm
Location: Tennessee
Contact:

Post by Kiran »

Awesome pictures!

I forgot that the Discovery channel are doing the series \"When We Left Earth\". What time zone is this 2100 in? I'd like to try to watch the show on Sunday.
User avatar
MD-1118
DBB Ace
DBB Ace
Posts: 343
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:08 pm
Location: Zombieland, USA... aka Florida

Re:

Post by MD-1118 »

Kyouryuu wrote:I don't know, I kind of agree with that. I don't understand why we didn't build a moon base instead. I have to believe that in the far off future, we'd be interested in colonizing planets. The ISS is like a houseboat. :P
I agree, the ISS is a POS high-tech space-house-boat. Though, the only reason for this is lack of support, both monetary and moral.
TIGERassault wrote:One of the biggest reasons the ISS is being constructed is because many experiments and such require a zero gravity condition, which could only be conducted in a space station or shuttle
I also agree here. However, there is one more thing I would like to add, and that is this: a space station in Earth orbit also gives NASA a "rest stop/gas station", of sorts. They can use it as an orbital shipyard eventually. They can fly materials and such up there and build a massive interstellar spacecraft, if they ever decide to do so. There's all kinds of cool ways to put a space station to use. Who knows, maybe one day they'll start constructing Pyros. :P
Post Reply