Red Faction Sequel Official

Pyro Pilots Lounge. For all topics *not* covered in other DBB forums.

Moderators: fliptw, roid

User avatar
CDN_Merlin
DBB_Master
DBB_Master
Posts: 9757
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
Location: Capital Of Canada

Red Faction Sequel Official

Post by CDN_Merlin »

Gary \"ElfShotTheFood\" McLean
Feb 5 2008, 4:16 PM


AGOURA HILLS, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--THQ Inc. (NASDAQ:THQI - News) today announced financial results for the third quarter of fiscal 2008, consistent with the company’s recently announced revised financial guidance. The company also reaffirmed its financial outlook for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008.

For the third quarter of fiscal 2008, THQ reported net sales of $509.6 million, driven primarily by WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2008, Cars: Mater-National and MX vs. ATV Untamed, each across multiple game systems. For the same period a year ago, THQ reported net sales of $475.7 million.

-----

“During the holiday quarter, we were pleased with the record performance of WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2008 and the successful launch of our internally developed game MX vs. ATV Untamed,” said Brian Farrell, THQ president and CEO.

Farrell continued, “We continue to strengthen our product development capabilities to support our long-term strategy of creating new owned intellectual properties. We look forward to launching Frontlines: Fuel of War at the end of this month. In fiscal 2009, we are well positioned for increased sales and profitability with strong owned intellectual properties such as Red Faction and Saints Row and well-known licensed franchises including WWE, UFC, Disney/Pixar and Nickelodeon.”

Recent Developments:

During the quarter, THQ shipped more than 5 million units of WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2008, bringing total lifetime WWE franchise net sales to more than $1 billion.
During the quarter, total lifetime Nickelodeon franchise net sales surpassed $1 billion, driven by Avatar, Nicktoons and SpongeBob SquarePants.

For the nine months ended December 31, 2007, THQ’s international net sales increased significantly, to 50% of total global net sales from 40% a year ago, as THQ continued to execute on its international growth strategy.

For the quarter and nine months ended December 31, 2007, THQ grew its Nintendo DS revenue 94% year-over-year, aided by the launch of Drawn to Life™, a newly established owned franchise created specifically for the Nintendo DS system.

On January 18, 2008, the company acquired Big Huge Games, a veteran development studio focused on the multi-billion dollar Role-Playing-Games market.

On January 23, 2008, THQ announced the appointment of two executives to newly-created product development positions to help drive new intellectual property creation.
On February 4, 2008, THQ announced the appointment of technology industry veteran Colin Slade as executive vice president and chief financial officer.
User avatar
Krom
DBB Database Master
DBB Database Master
Posts: 16058
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 1998 3:01 am
Location: Camping the energy center. BTW, did you know you can have up to 100 characters in this location box?
Contact:

Post by Krom »

That is no more proof than Interplay bragging about owning Descent.
User avatar
Top Wop
DBB Master
DBB Master
Posts: 5104
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Far from you.
Contact:

Post by Top Wop »

I was going to ask why. Then I read this:

\"THQ shipped more than 5 million units of WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2008\"

Figures.
User avatar
Kyouryuu
DBB Alumni
DBB Alumni
Posts: 5775
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 1999 2:01 am
Location: Isla Nublar
Contact:

Post by Kyouryuu »

No, Red Faction 3 is coming. I've seen it with my own eyes. :)
User avatar
Duper
DBB Master
DBB Master
Posts: 9214
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Beaverton, Oregon USA

Post by Duper »

lets hope its a bit better than the last 2 installments.

(I never cared for them all that much)
User avatar
roid
DBB Master
DBB Master
Posts: 9990
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Contact:

Re:

Post by roid »

Kyouryuu wrote:No, Red Faction 3 is coming. I've seen it with my own eyes. :)
haha, i never even realised there was a sequal. not sure OP did either *giggle*
it must've gone under my radARRR
User avatar
JMEaT
DBB Meat ByProduct
DBB Meat ByProduct
Posts: 10047
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 1999 3:01 am
Location: USA

Post by JMEaT »

Red Faction was fail. :(
User avatar
Sirius
DBB Master
DBB Master
Posts: 5616
Joined: Fri May 28, 1999 2:01 am
Location: Bellevue, WA
Contact:

Post by Sirius »

It's probably an idea whose time has finally come, considering we're seeing some more advanced physics these days. It was neat that it worked at all in 2001, but if they're creative enough it might be quite a lot more interesting now.

Truth be told geo-mod would have the biggest impact in a Battlefield/CoD4-style game though - would make the battleground more realistic in useful ways. Down in tunnels it less frequently makes such a difference.
User avatar
ccb056
DBB Fleet Admiral
DBB Fleet Admiral
Posts: 2540
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 2:01 am
Contact:

Post by ccb056 »

Yeah, so what youre saying is Descent totally got shafted.

Red Faction 1 was supposed to be Descent 4, but that never happened. They then went on to make Red Faction 2, and now I guess they are doing a 3rd one.

/me is not happy :(
I haven't lost my mind, it's backed up on disk somewhere.
User avatar
d3jake
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1075
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 10:08 am
Location: Minnesota, USA

Post by d3jake »

Its a major slap to the face when the game that was supposed to be D4 gets changed into a GP, and it does so well they're announcing a 3rd game, yeah, great, lemme tell THQ where it can stick its game...
User avatar
WillyP
DBB Ace
DBB Ace
Posts: 461
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 9:57 pm
Location: NH
Contact:

Re:

Post by WillyP »

Sirius wrote: Truth be told geo-mod would have the biggest impact in a Battlefield/CoD4-style game though - would make the battleground more realistic in useful ways. Down in tunnels it less frequently makes such a difference.
I was thinking just the opposite... at least for SP levels. You could have to dig around to connect to another mine. Actually some limited examples of this in D3, where you have to blow up some rock to fly through the hole created.
User avatar
Duper
DBB Master
DBB Master
Posts: 9214
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Beaverton, Oregon USA

Post by Duper »

geomodding was ok, but it had its limits. and imho, it wasn't all that.

Most new games have some form of interactive environment. It's just that in most you don't NEED to blow a hole in the ground. Be thankful shakers don't do the real damage the WISH they could. ;D
User avatar
Sirius
DBB Master
DBB Master
Posts: 5616
Joined: Fri May 28, 1999 2:01 am
Location: Bellevue, WA
Contact:

Post by Sirius »

Geo-modding by itself doesn't quite cut it, no. The really cool stuff would be technologies that allowed you to be creative in games. For instance, making booby-traps in buildings, shooting out the wheels from cars, or maybe digging holes to stop tanks. Shorting out wires, shooting out lights. Planting explosive devices to create diversions. And, of course, everyone's favourite, bringing down bridges. That kind of thing.
User avatar
roid
DBB Master
DBB Master
Posts: 9990
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Contact:

Post by roid »

basically nTrap
User avatar
mistercool2
DBB Ace
DBB Ace
Posts: 119
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:07 pm
Location: Ft Pierce, Florida
Contact:

Re:

Post by mistercool2 »

Kyouryuu wrote:No, Red Faction 3 is coming. I've seen it with my own eyes. :)
I've learned alot here in the last few months but some of this stuff is still "greek" to me. I do know that D3 is the coolest game I'VE ever played. :D

I saw this in the news this morning and wondered if someone could tell me how these would compare to the Red Faction games, Quake III Arena and D3.
1st-Person Shooting Games Win Top Honors
Published: 2/8/08, 8:05 AM EDT

LAS VEGAS (AP) - Three critically acclaimed first-person shooters won top honors at the video game industry's most prestigious awards show.

"BioShock," "Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare" and "The Orange Box" garnered four prizes apiece Thursday night at the 11th annual Interactive Achievement Awards.

"Call of Duty," praised for its unique online multiplayer leveling system, was named overall game of the year and console game of the year. It was also honored as the top action and online game. It features an intense single-player mission revolving around global terror as well as a diverse set of multiplayer modes.

"BioShock," which had a record-setting 12 nominations, won awards for art direction, story development, music and sound.

"The Orange Box," a compilation of five distinct games, was named computer game of the year. Its mind-bending physics puzzler, "Portal," was honored for game design, character performance and game play engineering.
Edit: umm ... now that I'm awake :roll: what I'd really like to know is if anyone is familiar with the games they're talking about, how would you compare them to D3?

Image
User avatar
Duper
DBB Master
DBB Master
Posts: 9214
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Beaverton, Oregon USA

Post by Duper »

D3 when it was released, D3 now or D3 on the whole?


wait.. Descent 3 or doom 3? ... I as because FPS are being discussed.
User avatar
mistercool2
DBB Ace
DBB Ace
Posts: 119
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:07 pm
Location: Ft Pierce, Florida
Contact:

Re:

Post by mistercool2 »

Duper wrote:D3 when it was released, D3 now or D3 on the whole?


wait.. Descent 3 or doom 3? ... I as because FPS are being discussed.
Descent 3 v1.4 which is the only version I've ever played. I've had Quake III for awhile but kinda lost interest since I got D3. Haven't played either one on line yet.

I've been told there's nothing out there that compares to D3, but I don't know anything about the ones they're talking about in the news report.
User avatar
d3jake
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1075
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 10:08 am
Location: Minnesota, USA

Post by d3jake »

The main difference between those games and D3 is that they're all Ground-pounders, that meaning that the whole point of the game is to run around with a gun in the lower right of your screen. The last \"Descent-like\" game to come out was.... Oh yeah! Descent 3. For some reason the gaming industry has decided to reincarnate the same type of gameplay an endless number of times. I think that the only trouble with a 6DoF game (think \"descent-like\") is that the controls may be difficult to master, thus making the average teenager who has the span of a newt say \"That's gay\" and start playing Counterstrike\\Halo.
User avatar
Krom
DBB Database Master
DBB Database Master
Posts: 16058
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 1998 3:01 am
Location: Camping the energy center. BTW, did you know you can have up to 100 characters in this location box?
Contact:

Post by Krom »

On top of being hard to master, availability of controllers that can handle Descent are also more limited than other types of games. It takes a really good keyboard to do the job with only a mouse in the other hand. Also if you use a joystick, not too many of them are built to last the kind of abuse that playing Descent requires. I've seen a new stick come out of the box and be broken within two days at a LAN party. I personally have resorted to finding spare switches for my Precision Pros to keep them working (and I also own four of them!).
User avatar
d3jake
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1075
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 10:08 am
Location: Minnesota, USA

Post by d3jake »

Looks like one of us will have to win the lottery so we can design a new stick, and market it...
User avatar
Sirius
DBB Master
DBB Master
Posts: 5616
Joined: Fri May 28, 1999 2:01 am
Location: Bellevue, WA
Contact:

Re:

Post by Sirius »

mistercool2 wrote:Edit: umm ... now that I'm awake :roll: what I'd really like to know is if anyone is familiar with the games they're talking about, how would you compare them to D3?
They're all much better, to be honest. This is a point of view though. They each have their own good points, but they are really quite good games - bringing certain things to the table none of the Descent games ever had, but they do lack a few things that would make them as fun for me to play. :)

BioShock has, from the reviews I've heard (media and friends), an incredible sense of atmosphere, and it lets you THINK.

Call of Duty is one of the most solid tactical shooters to date. It is similar to some of the Battlefield games, from the short bit I've played, except that it seems perhaps more stable and also tends to focus on urban settings more - which makes things more hectic and interesting. I may actually end up playing this one with a group of guys I know.

The Orange Box is basically Half-Life 2 + eps 1/2, Portal, and Team Fortress 2. HL2 is one of the best single-player FPS games ever made, and the follow-up episodes are quite impressive as well, I've heard. Portal is an unusually innovative, but short, title that evokes the memory and creativity that Descent used to have. Team Fortress 2 has been widely lauded as the most fun multiplayer shooter game in years.

All of the above are FPS games, naturally, but they are at the top of their field. If you're a die-hard Descent player, though, they're probably not what you're looking for.
User avatar
Kyouryuu
DBB Alumni
DBB Alumni
Posts: 5775
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 1999 2:01 am
Location: Isla Nublar
Contact:

Post by Kyouryuu »

I know it's controversial to say on a board dedicated to Descent, but really, some of you have got to join us in the year 2008. There are a lot of excellent games out there right now and to dismiss all of them as \"ground pounders\" is rather ignorant given the innovation that the genre has seen in the last few years. We all graduated from that moronic \"Doom clone\" nonsense years ago.
User avatar
Spaceboy
DBB Captain
DBB Captain
Posts: 603
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2004 11:43 pm
Contact:

Re:

Post by Spaceboy »

Kyouryuu wrote:I know it's controversial to say on a board dedicated to Descent, but really, some of you have got to join us in the year 2008. There are a lot of excellent games out there right now and to dismiss all of them as "ground pounders" is rather ignorant given the innovation that the genre has seen in the last few years. We all graduated from that moronic "Doom clone" nonsense years ago.
If people here did that, this board would be empty. :p
The term groundpounder seems kinda strange to me- Honestly, if you're going to categorize something with that much of a simplicity, you could probably say Descent is a copy off one of the thousands of star wars games that have been around in the 90s.
Don't get me wrong here, Descent is a good game that still has an almost untouched unique idea, but that doesn't mean all other games that don't involve descent-like characteristics suck.
User avatar
WillyP
DBB Ace
DBB Ace
Posts: 461
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 9:57 pm
Location: NH
Contact:

Re:

Post by WillyP »

Krom wrote:On top of being hard to master, availability of controllers that can handle Descent are also more limited than other types of games. It takes a really good keyboard to do the job with only a mouse in the other hand. Also if you use a joystick, not too many of them are built to last the kind of abuse that playing Descent requires. I've seen a new stick come out of the box and be broken within two days at a LAN party. I personally have resorted to finding spare switches for my Precision Pros to keep them working (and I also own four of them!).
True, but if the genre were more popular, manufactures would step in make the sticks better.

Also, most games now, with a few notable exceptions, tend to focus on 'realism', Descent is firmly set in an abstract world.
User avatar
CDN_Merlin
DBB_Master
DBB_Master
Posts: 9757
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
Location: Capital Of Canada

Re:

Post by CDN_Merlin »

d3jake wrote:The main difference between those games and D3 is that they're all Ground-pounders, that meaning that the whole point of the game is to run around with a gun in the lower right of your screen. The last "Descent-like" game to come out was.... Oh yeah! Descent 3. For some reason the gaming industry has decided to reincarnate the same type of gameplay an endless number of times. I think that the only trouble with a 6DoF game (think "descent-like") is that the controls may be difficult to master, thus making the average teenager who has the span of a newt say "That's gay" and start playing Counterstrike\\Halo.
I agree on this. Even myself, if a game requires more than 20 minutes to learn how to control, I give up. It's not worth my time.
User avatar
Foil
DBB Material Defender
DBB Material Defender
Posts: 4900
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Denver, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re:

Post by Foil »

Kyouryuu wrote:There are a lot of excellent games out there right now and to dismiss all of them as "ground pounders" is rather ignorant given the innovation that the genre has seen in the last few years.

I'm sorry, I have to agree with d3jake on this. There's nothing out there on store shelves yet that has even come close to true 6DoF movement.

"But Crysis had this cool 6DoF section toward the end - you can't call it a ground-pounder!"

Crysis is a ground-pounder, albeit a fun one. However, that 'zero-G' section at the end was anything but 6DoF.
User avatar
Kyouryuu
DBB Alumni
DBB Alumni
Posts: 5775
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 1999 2:01 am
Location: Isla Nublar
Contact:

Re:

Post by Kyouryuu »

Foil wrote:There's nothing out there on store shelves yet that has even come close to true 6DoF movement.
Sure, if you take the myopic view that 6DoF games are the only games worth your time. :P
User avatar
Foil
DBB Material Defender
DBB Material Defender
Posts: 4900
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Denver, Colorado, USA
Contact:

Re:

Post by Foil »

Kyouryuu wrote:
Foil wrote:There's nothing out there on store shelves yet that has even come close to true 6DoF movement.
Sure, if you take the myopic view that 6DoF games are the only games worth your time. :P
I didn't say that.

But there's something special and different about 6DoF games that's missing from the other games out there.
User avatar
mistercool2
DBB Ace
DBB Ace
Posts: 119
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:07 pm
Location: Ft Pierce, Florida
Contact:

Re:

Post by mistercool2 »

Sirius wrote: All of the above are FPS games, naturally, but they are at the top of their field. If you're a die-hard Descent player, though, they're probably not what you're looking for.
After reading all this I'm inclined to agree.

I've never been all that interested in video games until I tried the Quake III demo several years ago and shortly thereafter got the full version. But now with D3 (which is running perfect thanks to you guys, especially fliptw :wink: ) I'd probably be disappointed with anything else. I'm not sure if I'm a "die-hard" Descent player or not, but I can go without potato chips and ice cream. :lol:

Although I know very little about all the games out there, I think overall, D3 is gonna be hard to beat. If that does happen ... I'll be 1st in line. :D

Thanks everybody!

Image
User avatar
Sirius
DBB Master
DBB Master
Posts: 5616
Joined: Fri May 28, 1999 2:01 am
Location: Bellevue, WA
Contact:

Post by Sirius »

Call me a cynic, but threads like this make me wonder if the Descent community lost its imagination...

Firstly, \"ground-pounder\" is an anachronism, as it excessively simplifies the issue... would you call Oblivion a ground-pounder? World of Warcraft? The original concept for Descent 4 (which had on-foot sequences)? Back in the days of Doom, DN3D and Quake it had a point, because they were a very distinctive style of game and there wasn't much variety out there... but the field has changed hugely in the last ten years.

Secondly, Descent 3 is not actually as good as popular belief would dictate... it's simply the prettiest Descent game released. It could easily be surpassed if anyone tried; the problem is no-one who could get to release has tried. The graphics are now rather dated; the mod support and editors are third-rate; the game could be easier to handle on keyboard/mouse (wouldn't take THAT much effort, Minerva is a fairly good example); and the gameplay and weapon balance is really pretty poor (there's a reason why D1 was always the most popular game on the IDL; it was the most competitive).

I dunno. It just seems like we're collectively living under a rock. Go out and play some new games, they might give you ideas! You might even like them!
User avatar
Jeff250
DBB Master
DBB Master
Posts: 6522
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 1999 2:01 am
Location: ❄️❄️❄️

Post by Jeff250 »

The Orange Box is unbelievably good. *_*
User avatar
Sirius
DBB Master
DBB Master
Posts: 5616
Joined: Fri May 28, 1999 2:01 am
Location: Bellevue, WA
Contact:

Post by Sirius »

I wish I had the spare cash for it. You think they'll release all the Orange Box material again when Ep3 comes out?
User avatar
TIGERassault
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1600
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 3:33 pm

Re:

Post by TIGERassault »

Does Super Mario Galaxy count as 6DoF?
:P
Sirius wrote:I wish I had the spare cash for it. You think they'll release all the Orange Box material again when Ep3 comes out?
No, they wouldn't be re-released. But I don't see why Steam would've stopped selling them by that time in the first place.
User avatar
Duper
DBB Master
DBB Master
Posts: 9214
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Beaverton, Oregon USA

Re:

Post by Duper »

TIGERassault wrote:Does Super Mario Galaxy count as 6DoF?
:P
no.. banging into bricks in a pyro is a BAD thing. ;)
User avatar
Sirius
DBB Master
DBB Master
Posts: 5616
Joined: Fri May 28, 1999 2:01 am
Location: Bellevue, WA
Contact:

Post by Sirius »

Oh, I mainly mean if the Orange Box material is included in a new \"box\" + ep3. That would be pretty compelling for me. Probably would be about two years later than everyone else though.
User avatar
d3jake
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1075
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 10:08 am
Location: Minnesota, USA

Re:

Post by d3jake »

Sirius wrote:Firstly, "ground-pounder" is an anachronism, as it excessively simplifies the issue... would you call Oblivion a ground-pounder? World of Warcraft? The original concept for Descent 4 (which had on-foot sequences)?
d3jake wrote:Ground-pounders, that meaning that the whole point of the game is to run around with a gun in the lower right of your screen
At least that's the definition I use... In the event of a realized D4, then we wouldn't even be having this conversation.
The graphics are now rather dated; the mod support and editors are third-rate; the game could be easier to handle on keyboard/mouse (wouldn't take THAT much effort, Minerva is a fairly good example);
Please tell us how it could be made 'easier to handle on keyboard\\mouse'. I think that a mouser has enough advantages as is, and we don't need to cater to them any more...
User avatar
Krom
DBB Database Master
DBB Database Master
Posts: 16058
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 1998 3:01 am
Location: Camping the energy center. BTW, did you know you can have up to 100 characters in this location box?
Contact:

Post by Krom »

To help keyboard/mouse pilots think of auto-level on steroids. The current implementation of auto-level in D3 rather stinks in short. It doesn't work that well at what it is supposed to do and often gets in the way because it tries to completely level the ship, even if you actually want to be looking up or down.

If you wanted to make an auto-level to make life easier on keyboard/mouse players, just include an extra set of paths through the entire level that can lock the ships banking axis so it behaves exactly like a \"ground pounder\". In exchange for always being \"upright\", they lose the ability to trichord, but that would greatly help a lot of players from getting disoriented. The only problem would be levels with a lot of vertical shafts and rooms like Polaris or Apparition. But since most levels in play are flat and not too far off in design from a ground pounder level that type of restriction on the controls wouldn't bother most people.
User avatar
Kyouryuu
DBB Alumni
DBB Alumni
Posts: 5775
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 1999 2:01 am
Location: Isla Nublar
Contact:

Re:

Post by Kyouryuu »

d3jake wrote:Please tell us how it could be made 'easier to handle on keyboard\\mouse'. I think that a mouser has enough advantages as is, and we don't need to cater to them any more...
And it's that sort of attitude that ensures another 6DoF game will never be made, much less one that would satisfy the "community."

Only under that flawed logic can one ignore the simple fact that every popular PC game uses the mouse. From BioShock to World of Warcraft, from Oblivion to Half-Life 2. Players do not want to learn gobs of keyboard combinations and buy joysticks in order to play a game. Even back when Descent was popular, that learning curve turned away a lot of gamers. It's only worse now - people by and large don't own joysticks.
Sllik
DBB Ace
DBB Ace
Posts: 473
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Post by Sllik »

I think if you visit Joystick Required's website, you'll find at least a few others outside the Descent scene that want to see more of a challenge than a simple keyboard and mouse interface can provide.

The stigma in this thread seems to lean towards the opinion that most of the oldskool Descenters that still frequent this forum are stuck playing 6DoF games and won't play anything else. If you use me as an example, I have played more games since 1983 than most people can fathom, and I'm still playing many of the newest releases when they're released or soon after. After getting a massive case of burnout from non-stop World of Warcraft since closed beta days, I'm currently indulging in some EVE and using Team Fortress 2 (an absolut RIOT OF A GAME - I higly recommend) as an alternative to break up the EVE mission grind while I train up better skills to PvP. I'm also keeping a close eye on the Chronicles of Spellborn, Warhammer Online, Age of Conan, and Jumpgate Evolution.

But guess what - I still regularly go back and play one of the Descent series or D2X-XL, because they have exceeded in the 6DoF arena like no other, and will be hard to beat in the future by any game that attempts to steal the crown. Yes, they're dated, and yes they have a high learning curve, but they are hands-down the greatest skill challenge I have ever come across. Flying with skill and grace in a Pyro gives me a greater sense of accomplishment and a greater degree of control and freedom than anything that has come out since. And that includes TF2, WoW, EVE, Q3, Crysis, JGC, VO, EQ1/2, Forsaken, and anything else I can't think of that's not worth mentioning as a contender because I can't think of it to put it in this list.

I'm definitely looking forward to the new releases, but I hold onto the best and keep playing them. And Descent is, hands-down, one of best. ;)
DarkHorse
DBB Captain
DBB Captain
Posts: 770
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Auckland
Contact:

Post by DarkHorse »

With massive franchises like Unreal selling poorly even when they're very good games, I don't think there's much chance of Descent making a comeback on the PC. MMOs are doing alright, RTSs are doing fairly well, but the FPS genre seems to be migrating to consoles. Halo 3, an XBox 360 title, sold spectacularly. UT3, a PC exclusive, just about bombed.


Fortunately, there are only a small handful of features that are truly essential to Descent-like gameplay, and the controller isn't one of them. All you really need is free movement in any axis and weapons that are more than just point-and-click. The rest is dressing.

And if the controls are easier to master, so be it. That just means new players will get onto the real challenge, the mind game, quicker.
Post Reply