The Way off Oil

For discussion of life's issues: current events, social trends and personal opinions.

Moderators: Tunnelcat, Jeff250

Post Reply
User avatar
Dakatsu
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1575
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 12:22 am
Location: St. Petersburg, Florida

The Way off Oil

Post by Dakatsu »

One thing that worries me about the energy crisis is, lets say we get electric cars tomorrow, with all the technology blah blah blah. There are many problems with the concept of the switchover, simply because:

1. We would have to get enough people to use electric vehicles.
2. We would need enough corporations to sell power (either by recharging batteries in a gas-station format, or buying new batteries.

So, we would have to scale these things simultaneously; we can't have energy stations without cars or else the corporations won't get money and close them down, but we also can't have cars without an ability to refuel.

The only option I could foresee is for the government to get highly involved with changing the vehicle types and fueling areas at the same time. As any logical person knows, however, any government involvement in anything is bad. So, given the proposition that the tech is all possible tomorrow, how would we go about in switching this country from oil to electric or whatever?
User avatar
Spidey
DBB Grand Master
DBB Grand Master
Posts: 10725
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2001 2:01 am
Location: Earth

Post by Spidey »

Most electric cars need to be recharged overnight and can be done at home. As far as recharging electric cars at “recharging stations” I don’t know of any batteries that can be recharged in a time frame that would make that feasible. When the time comes when that is possible, we won’t need government because there will be plenty of money to be made.

It would also be very easy to set up recharging stations, the grid is everywhere.
User avatar
SuperSheep
DBB Benefactor
DBB Benefactor
Posts: 935
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2001 2:01 am
Location: Illinois

Post by SuperSheep »

Gonna have to side with Spidey on this one. This isn't the classic chicken & egg problem, this is easier.

The electric cars come first. Recharge at home.

When enough people have electric cars and begin to want to drive farther than work and back, demand will set in for refueling centers for electrics.
User avatar
[RIP]Machete_Bug
DBB Ace
DBB Ace
Posts: 45
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 5:03 pm
Location: USA

Post by [RIP]Machete_Bug »

Most electric cars need to be recharged overnight and can be done at home. As far as recharging electric cars at “recharging stations” I don’t know of any batteries that can be recharged in a time frame that would make that feasible.
If batteries were made to a universal standard, and easily installed, one might see stations where you swap your battery. Pull into the station, you pay them some money, they take your discharged battery and slap in a new one so you can make it the rest of the way to Grandma's house in time for Thanksgiving dinner. Meanwhile the station charges the battery up so a few hours later they can sell it to another customer.
User avatar
Krom
DBB Database Master
DBB Database Master
Posts: 16058
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 1998 3:01 am
Location: Camping the energy center. BTW, did you know you can have up to 100 characters in this location box?
Contact:

Post by Krom »

Of course no matter how great the demand for it, if we don't have the technology to refill a battery to 100% charge in 3-5 minutes than the concept of a electric refueling station still won't fly. There are other things that people are working on in the mean time and every little bit helps. For one, anything we can do to improve the efficiency of the average automobile engine is a step in the right direction (and there is a lot of room for improvement).
User avatar
Dakatsu
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1575
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 12:22 am
Location: St. Petersburg, Florida

Post by Dakatsu »

You guys forgot about long distance travel, such as inter-state. Me and my family use many tanks of gas to get from St. Petersburg, FL to Grand Island, NE. We would need recharging stations, or very effective batteries.
User avatar
Top Wop
DBB Master
DBB Master
Posts: 5104
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Far from you.
Contact:

Post by Top Wop »

Thats why the Chevy Volt seems to be the most feasible solution. All the benefits of an electric car, but if you need to go far, bang, you have an onboard generator charging up your batteries.
Cuda68
DBB Captain
DBB Captain
Posts: 745
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2001 2:01 am
Location: Denver, CO USA
Contact:

Post by Cuda68 »

Seems to me once the car is running a high output alternator (or two) could take over with the use of gear reduction to cut back on drag while driving.

Edit: Yea - what TopWop said :P
User avatar
Spidey
DBB Grand Master
DBB Grand Master
Posts: 10725
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2001 2:01 am
Location: Earth

Re:

Post by Spidey »

[RIP]Machete_Bug wrote:
Most electric cars need to be recharged overnight and can be done at home. As far as recharging electric cars at “recharging stations” I don’t know of any batteries that can be recharged in a time frame that would make that feasible.
If batteries were made to a universal standard, and easily installed, one might see stations where you swap your battery. Pull into the station, you pay them some money, they take your discharged battery and slap in a new one so you can make it the rest of the way to Grandma's house in time for Thanksgiving dinner. Meanwhile the station charges the battery up so a few hours later they can sell it to another customer.
Swap out 3000 dollar, 700 pound batteries? (prices and weight for dramatic effect only) :wink:
User avatar
CUDA
DBB Master
DBB Master
Posts: 6482
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 2:01 am
Location: A Conservative Man in the Liberal bastion of the Pacific Northwest. in Oregon City. Oregon

Post by CUDA »

not to mention HIGHLY deadly if miss-handled
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.” 

― Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Ferno
DBB Commie Anarchist Thug
DBB Commie Anarchist Thug
Posts: 15026
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 1998 3:01 am

Post by Ferno »

here's a shot of the batteries going into the volt

http://www.fuel-efficient-vehicles.org/ ... y-pack.jpg


It's a new type of battery. they call it Lithium Iorn Phosphate or LiFE for short.

Long story short is you can punch a nail thru these and all they do is emit a whiff of smoke.

I have 6 of their earlier cells. each put out a nominal 3.3v and they've gone through everything, including being crushed by a car.

Even the KillaCycle, built by A123 has their earlier cells. If you've seen the president of the company drive into a car, you'll know how safe these things can be.
User avatar
Duper
DBB Master
DBB Master
Posts: 9214
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Beaverton, Oregon USA

Post by Duper »

Here's a little more that i found on the same site. It makes that Japanese car claim earlier quite believable.
User avatar
dissent
DBB Fleet Admiral
DBB Fleet Admiral
Posts: 2159
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 12:17 pm
Location: Illinois

Post by dissent »

y'know, I've been wondering;

how well do these electric cars perform in really cold weather (say, below 10 F)?

And how do they generate heat for the passenger cabin during cold weather?
User avatar
ccb056
DBB Fleet Admiral
DBB Fleet Admiral
Posts: 2540
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 2:01 am
Contact:

Post by ccb056 »

If we want to get off oil the right way it most certainly is not with battery powered electric cars.

The conventional battery is nearing the end of its life, there just arent that many more innovations that can be made to it.

The best solution to decreasing carbon emissions is dumping the oil, gas, and coal power plants replacing them with nukes, using that energy to power our homes, businesses, and industry; and then use hydrogen fuel cells for mobile power.
I haven't lost my mind, it's backed up on disk somewhere.
User avatar
Duper
DBB Master
DBB Master
Posts: 9214
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Beaverton, Oregon USA

Post by Duper »

The problem with nuke power now is that it's \"dirty\" and expensive. Plants have a life of only 20 years.(*edit-mistake fixed) ... then you need to build a new one. And with the horror stories i heard from construction workers that built the one that near where I live, I'd rather not have another one go up anytime soon. Washington state has something like 4 or 5 Fission reactor plants (most with multiple reactors) that have been mothballed for 20 years in various states of construction. It costs a LOT to build those things and no one is wanting to foot the bill. that's the reason they have been mothballed. the corp went bellyup. Google \"WPPSS\" (pronounced \"whoops\") and that's what it was. :roll:
Ford Prefect
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1557
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 2:01 am
Location: Richmond,B. C., Canada

Post by Ford Prefect »

Plants have a life of only 2 years. ... then you need to build a new one
Umm.. no that's not right. Perhaps you are referring to the time the core fuel lasts before you need to change it.
http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf08.html
There are a lot of nuclear plants around the world that have been working for decades.
Clothes may make the man
But all a girl needs is a tan

-The Producers
User avatar
Spidey
DBB Grand Master
DBB Grand Master
Posts: 10725
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2001 2:01 am
Location: Earth

Post by Spidey »

The biggest joke of all concerning Nuclear Power, was the lie the government told the people when they started building the first plants…

“Nuclear Power will be so cheap they won’t even have to meter the usage”

LOL!
User avatar
Krom
DBB Database Master
DBB Database Master
Posts: 16058
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 1998 3:01 am
Location: Camping the energy center. BTW, did you know you can have up to 100 characters in this location box?
Contact:

Post by Krom »

Want cheaper cleaner power? Easy! Find a cleaner and cheaper method to boil water.
User avatar
MD-1118
DBB Ace
DBB Ace
Posts: 343
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:08 pm
Location: Zombieland, USA... aka Florida

Re:

Post by MD-1118 »

Krom wrote:Want cheaper cleaner power? Easy! Find a cleaner and cheaper method to boil water.
That's easy... create a vaccuum around it. :P
User avatar
Krom
DBB Database Master
DBB Database Master
Posts: 16058
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 1998 3:01 am
Location: Camping the energy center. BTW, did you know you can have up to 100 characters in this location box?
Contact:

Re:

Post by Krom »

MD-1118 wrote:That's easy... create a vaccuum around it. :P
And while you are at it, create a vacuum around this dork too, save oxygen. ;) :P
User avatar
Dakatsu
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1575
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 12:22 am
Location: St. Petersburg, Florida

Re:

Post by Dakatsu »

Ford Prefect wrote:
Plants have a life of only 2 years. ... then you need to build a new one
Umm.. no that's not right. Perhaps you are referring to the time the core fuel lasts before you need to change it.
http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf08.html
There are a lot of nuclear plants around the world that have been working for decades.
Like Chernobyl! :D

(could not resist!)
Ford Prefect
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1557
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 2:01 am
Location: Richmond,B. C., Canada

Post by Ford Prefect »

Chernobyll is functioning well even as we speak. It's working as a perfect object lesson on why you shouldn't let total morons run your nuclear facility. :wink:
Clothes may make the man
But all a girl needs is a tan

-The Producers
User avatar
MD-1118
DBB Ace
DBB Ace
Posts: 343
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:08 pm
Location: Zombieland, USA... aka Florida

Post by MD-1118 »

Don't forget Three Mile Island. :D :D
User avatar
Duper
DBB Master
DBB Master
Posts: 9214
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Beaverton, Oregon USA

Re:

Post by Duper »

Ford Prefect wrote:
Plants have a life of only 2 years. ... then you need to build a new one
Umm.. no that's not right. Perhaps you are referring to the time the core fuel lasts before you need to change it.
http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf08.html
There are a lot of nuclear plants around the world that have been working for decades.
yeah, typo on my part. I meant 20 years. fixed it in the post above. Sry, thx.
User avatar
Duper
DBB Master
DBB Master
Posts: 9214
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Beaverton, Oregon USA

Re:

Post by Duper »

Ford Prefect wrote:Chernobyl is functioning well even as we speak. It's working as a perfect object lesson on why you shouldn't let total morons run your nuclear facility. :wink:
really though, that was a fusion reactor and they had a "perfect failure" scenario. Any plant would be in trouble if you have multiple fail safes fail.
User avatar
fliptw
DBB DemiGod
DBB DemiGod
Posts: 6458
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 1998 2:01 am
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada

Re:

Post by fliptw »

Duper wrote:
Ford Prefect wrote:Chernobyl is functioning well even as we speak. It's working as a perfect object lesson on why you shouldn't let total morons run your nuclear facility. :wink:
really though, that was a fusion reactor and they had a "perfect failure" scenario. Any plant would be in trouble if you have multiple fail safes fail.
Thats news to me, Chernobyl being a fusion reactor...
User avatar
Floyd
DBB Captain
DBB Captain
Posts: 561
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 2:01 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re:

Post by Floyd »

CUDA wrote:not to mention HIGHLY deadly if miss-handled
aside from what ferno said, imagine fuel. you drive it around all day. you'd also drive around the batteries. i've yet to see a battery shelf that had a no smoking/open fire sign ;)
Ford Prefect
DBB Admiral
DBB Admiral
Posts: 1557
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 2:01 am
Location: Richmond,B. C., Canada

Post by Ford Prefect »

The reactor a Chernobyl failed when the operators were screwing around with the system doing a test that was ill advised to say the least.
The test plan called for the power output of reactor 4 to be reduced from its nominal 3.2 GW thermal to 0.7–1.0 GW thermal. For unknown reasons, Toptunov committed an error and inserted the control rods too far, causing the reactor to a near shut down. The exact circumstances will probably never be known as both Akimov and Toptunov died from radiation sickness.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_disaster
Clothes may make the man
But all a girl needs is a tan

-The Producers
Cuda68
DBB Captain
DBB Captain
Posts: 745
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2001 2:01 am
Location: Denver, CO USA
Contact:

Post by Cuda68 »

I see my stomach lining won't be getting a break today. :P
Post Reply