🚗 The modern 🚙🚙 city is 🛻made for 🚙 cars 🚛 and not people 🛻🚙🚗
Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2024 10:53 am
My wife and I bought a house not too long ago, and we had two different mindsets: She wanted the biggest house possible while I wanted an area connected to the main walking trails so that we had easy access to stores and the ability to commute to our jobs by bike. We ended up buying a pretty decent-sized house, larger than either of our parents' houses, in a neighborhood that's kind of a suburban hub (not sure what the correct word is). However, my office is a whopping 40 minute bike ride away, but it's a safe ride on a trail, which is far better than what we'd get if we had bought a big house off a farm road, which my wife was kind of pushing for. My wife got the best improvement as she now has less than a one minute commute to work by car or a 20-minute walk... she walks faster to her job than I can bike to mine. On top of that, 15 minutes away walking, in the same block as our neighborhood, we have 2 grocery stores, 5 restaurants, 2 medical clinics, a cafe, and more stuff is getting built. Still though, my neighborhood still prioritizes cars over people despite the higher than normal walk-ability.
My mother, who lives about a mile away, basically has no walkable paths leading out of her subdivision. She has to drive to go anywhere safely. Some of my coworkers live in nearby cities that are just a collection of streets off the highway, trading the low cost of land for needing to drive to another municipality to go grocery shopping. My in-laws are in a neighborhood that wasn't always part of the city and has no walkable areas. My cousins just bought a new house in the next city, built around a golf course, giving it a very luxurious feel, but the neighborhood itself has no sidewalks, and there’s only one very small convenience store in the city that’s a 30-minute walk away, forcing you to drive into the next town to grocery shop. If you can’t tell, this is Texas, and it’s one of the worst when it comes to building cities for people. It makes it where, if you don't have a car, you're absolutely, without question, a second class citizen. That's ★■◆●ing wrong.
When the issue of traffic is brought up, 99% of the time the solution is adding more roads. City planners can't comprehend people walking for any reason other than recreation. The term "15 minute city" is sad because something that's 15 mintues away isn't that close. Again, I live 15 minutes from stores. I wouldn't consider it a close walk, but it's only that far because cars need space for roads and roads make everything farther away than they need to be.. If it weren't for cars, I think my house would be a 5 minute walk to those stores. The roads themselves are heat batteries that increase the temperature of where you live even at night. The cities look uglier, small stores get noticed less as the major roadways provide better infrastructure for big box stores. It's like a bad science fiction where someone would criticize it for "not being realistic" because it's really not. The grocery store being father away means needing a bigger house and refrigerator because you're basically on an island compared to a place where you can walk 2 minutes away to buy eggs like in an old city.
What's my point? I don't have have one. I'm basically ranting about something we'll never solve. "If you don't like it you can get out". Sure! I think about these really nice old cities, like the one in the photo above as a perfect place to live. There are places in europe and mexico like this because the US has no hope of fixing the car problem.


My mother, who lives about a mile away, basically has no walkable paths leading out of her subdivision. She has to drive to go anywhere safely. Some of my coworkers live in nearby cities that are just a collection of streets off the highway, trading the low cost of land for needing to drive to another municipality to go grocery shopping. My in-laws are in a neighborhood that wasn't always part of the city and has no walkable areas. My cousins just bought a new house in the next city, built around a golf course, giving it a very luxurious feel, but the neighborhood itself has no sidewalks, and there’s only one very small convenience store in the city that’s a 30-minute walk away, forcing you to drive into the next town to grocery shop. If you can’t tell, this is Texas, and it’s one of the worst when it comes to building cities for people. It makes it where, if you don't have a car, you're absolutely, without question, a second class citizen. That's ★■◆●ing wrong.
When the issue of traffic is brought up, 99% of the time the solution is adding more roads. City planners can't comprehend people walking for any reason other than recreation. The term "15 minute city" is sad because something that's 15 mintues away isn't that close. Again, I live 15 minutes from stores. I wouldn't consider it a close walk, but it's only that far because cars need space for roads and roads make everything farther away than they need to be.. If it weren't for cars, I think my house would be a 5 minute walk to those stores. The roads themselves are heat batteries that increase the temperature of where you live even at night. The cities look uglier, small stores get noticed less as the major roadways provide better infrastructure for big box stores. It's like a bad science fiction where someone would criticize it for "not being realistic" because it's really not. The grocery store being father away means needing a bigger house and refrigerator because you're basically on an island compared to a place where you can walk 2 minutes away to buy eggs like in an old city.
What's my point? I don't have have one. I'm basically ranting about something we'll never solve. "If you don't like it you can get out". Sure! I think about these really nice old cities, like the one in the photo above as a perfect place to live. There are places in europe and mexico like this because the US has no hope of fixing the car problem.