
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/li ... on-center/
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/nur ... a-n1240110
Moderators: Jeff250, Tunnelcat
Woody: *ignores fact that the fascist piece of ★■◆● he supports is actively committing crimes against humanity in order to erect a patently-false straw man*woodchip wrote: Thu Sep 24, 2020 6:30 am Yet you have no problem with late term abortion or killing the babe even if it is born alive after all that. Maybe the poor immigrant women has indicated she will vote conservative if she stays here![]()
Just exactly what crimes?Top Gun wrote: Thu Sep 24, 2020 11:23 amWoody: *ignores fact that the fascist piece of ★■◆● he supports is actively committing crimes against humanity in order to erect a patently-false straw man*woodchip wrote: Thu Sep 24, 2020 6:30 am Yet you have no problem with late term abortion or killing the babe even if it is born alive after all that. Maybe the poor immigrant women has indicated she will vote conservative if she stays here![]()
Longer than yours I suspect.
*looks up at OP*
Where in the hell did you get that? In a debate with Foil a while back, I stated that I'm against abortion EXCEPT in cases of rape and incest and only in the first term. Although in my case if I were raped, I'd abort no matter how late in the term. But you wouldn't understand that from a male point of view anyway. I'm certainly against late term abortions as practice. And abortion isn't even germane to the topic since women who have abortions do it VOLUNTARILY of their own volition, not under the orders of a dictator.woodchip wrote: Thu Sep 24, 2020 6:30 am Yet you have no problem with late term abortion or killing the babe even if it is born alive after all that. Maybe the poor immigrant women has indicated she will vote conservative if she stays here![]()
This issue is even more important today, because the police are now the ones having to deal with people who are having serious mental issues and it always seems to come out badly and involving the discharge of firearms and injury or death to the "patient" as a solution. I don't blame the police, other than they are way too militarized and willing to use deadly force in non-deadly situations. However, they are not mental health medical experts, nor do they have the resources to deal with it properly and thus are the wrong people to have to deal with it. But thanks to Reagan, they get to handle the job now.Krom wrote: Thu Sep 24, 2020 5:39 pm Gotta save the children, just wait till they grow up and then the police can murder them without upsetting conservatives.
Who let woodchip out of the asylum? Oh right, one of Ronald Regan's lesser known legacies is how he destroyed the mental heath system in America, which is why people like woodchip are allowed to run free, spread their toxic ideas, and worst of all vote.
Evidently it was ok in CA long before Trump was POTUS:
Hey guys woody's responding to another objective statement with some random irrelevant strawman bull★■◆●. Take a shot!woodchip wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 7:09 am Evidently it was ok in CA long before Trump was POTUS:
Beginning in 1909 and continuing for 70 years, California led the country in the number of sterilization procedures performed on men and women, often without their full knowledge and consent. Approximately 20,000 sterilizations took place in state institutions, comprising one-third of the total number performed in the 32 states where such action was legal.
https://www.pbs.org/independentlens/blo ... ed-states/
Eh, I enjoy playing poke-the-dumbass.vision wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 1:25 pm What are you guys arguing with a mentally ill person? The only reason he's probably making noise now is because he probably heard some bad news or the QAnon propaganda machine finally has him completely under their control.
I'm actually happy that he's posting again. He's the perfect pigeon/dupe who regurgitates all the right-wing propaganda he ingests. You can use him as a barometer for the health of the Republican Party. If he's upset, that means the GOP aren't doing so good and they are pumping out more mania-inducing memes to get the base good and scared. Maybe models of their planned overthrow of democracy are below the statistical threshold for success and they need a backup plan in the form of actual votes for Trump?
No worse than the left putting up the likes of AOC, Ilhan Omar and foul mouth Rashida Tlaib. These crazies have won already and inspiring others to do so.Tunnelcat wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 5:42 pm Trouble is, QAnon people are now running for office, where they think they can "legitimize" and spread their craziness. Most of them are running under the Republican ticket and some are winning. Geezus. This country has gone waaaay off the deep end. I used to occasionally vote conservative. Now, no way in Hell.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/12/politics ... index.html
Yes woody, we already know nothing terrifies you more than powerful women of color.woodchip wrote: Tue Sep 29, 2020 2:24 pm No worse than the left putting up the likes of AOC, Ilhan Omar and foul mouth Rashida Tlaib. These crazies have won already and inspiring others to do so.
Maybe once you try 'socialized' healthcare, you'll realize you were wrong.... about a lot of things.woodchip wrote: Tue Sep 29, 2020 2:24 pm No worse than the left putting up the likes of AOC, Ilhan Omar and foul mouth Rashida Tlaib. These crazies have won already and inspiring others to do so.
All strong, smart women who aren't afraid to voice their opinions and happen to be Muslims. So what? Do they rub you the wrong way because of their religion or their smarts? I'm guessing both. If you'd said religion, I could say the same thing about Amy Coney Barrett since she is a member of a more extreme Catholic Sect that I do not agree with nor want influencing any judicial decisions on my behalf as an American citizen. And NONE of these women you name subscribe to the absolute untruthful nonsense that Q ANON squirts out like a fire hose every day just to satiate their thirsty nutcase thralls. And before you sit there and whine that those woman you named are foul mouthed, better start listening to the claptrap your exalted leader spouts during one of his boner rallies. IF conservatives want a civil discourse, and I'm getting damned tired of hearing a lot of them say that we should just all be civil, start by cleaning our own foul house by voting out that potty-mouthed bully in chief you elected for president. The ONLY reason that bastard won in 2016 is because the Dems were stupid enough to run Hillary Clinton, an equally loathsome and polarizing character, against him. It was a choice between grey vomit and an orange turd and the orange turd won, but only in the Electoral College.woodchip wrote: Tue Sep 29, 2020 2:24 pmNo worse than the left putting up the likes of AOC, Ilhan Omar and foul mouth Rashida Tlaib. These crazies have won already and inspiring others to do so.Tunnelcat wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 5:42 pm Trouble is, QAnon people are now running for office, where they think they can "legitimize" and spread their craziness. Most of them are running under the Republican ticket and some are winning. Geezus. This country has gone waaaay off the deep end. I used to occasionally vote conservative. Now, no way in Hell.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/12/politics ... index.html
Maybe this country would be better off if we spent more on decent and affordable healthcare instead of feeding the massive military industrial complex we're now stuck with. And before you defend the rich, take a gander at how the "rich" pay their taxes, or should I say "lack" of taxes. Geez, I wish I had enough money to able to lose so much that I only had to pay either zero or $750 in taxes. Biden and his wife had to cough up $288,000 last year. On top of that, the 300 million in loans that are coming due next year make Trump a serious security risk in his position as President of the United States.Spidey wrote: Tue Sep 29, 2020 9:06 pm You mean like having a huge military budget, that gives other developed nations the luxury of having more to spend on social services.
You mean like that?
Oh that's right, I forgot...if we just make the rich pay their fair share everything would be hunky-dory.
Who the hell are we fighting right now, Spidey? Just what is our military defending us from, pray tell? When exactly has it "protected our country" since 1945?Spidey wrote: Tue Sep 29, 2020 9:06 pm You mean like having a huge military budget, that gives other developed nations the luxury of having more to spend on social services.
You mean like that?
Oh that's right, I forgot...if we just make the rich pay their fair share everything would be hunky-dory.
LOL name one. I was pointing this out to a friend of mine the other day that if wages were equal and we had a socialized workforce there would be no need for an investor class. Our economic system and government prop up a class structure of elites and undesirables. Guess what Spidey? Everyone here is in that later category and we could use your help.Spidey wrote: Wed Sep 30, 2020 7:21 am...you miss all of the other contributions that wealthy people contribute to an economy.
We spend *more* on healthcare than every other country, and get less in return.Spidey wrote:You mean like having a huge military budget, that gives other developed nations the luxury of having more to spend on social services.
Yes, our tax system is progressive and yes, wealthy people contribute to society by creating businesses and an economy that puts people to work. I personally benefit from the stock market because my personal funds are sitting there earning money for my living expenses. But even with what we've saved throughout our years of hard work, we're not even in the top 10% of wage earners in retirement, which is technically anything above $158,000 a year.Spidey wrote: Wed Sep 30, 2020 7:21 am Well TC if all you respond to is the dog whistle "taxes" then you miss all of the other contributions that wealthy people contribute to an economy.
I have to go to the doctor right now, but if you want a list, just ask
Just because something is legal doesn't make it right.woodchip wrote: Fri Oct 09, 2020 9:26 amSo Trumps accountants use existing tax law to minimize what Trump has to pay in taxes and you find that troublesome?
The question isn't that using existing tax law to his advantage is troublesome, although I sure most hard working people in this country would disagree with that practice. The question is, did he use illegal or creative accounting methods and other dirty shenanigans when reporting those losses, which is TAX FRAUD? Now you can see why he doesn't want to lose the election. If he does, he's in all likelihood going to be indicted for tax evasion and fraud and end up in jail, an outcome I'd love to see.woodchip wrote: Fri Oct 09, 2020 9:26 am So Trumps accountants use existing tax law to minimize what Trump has to pay in taxes and you find that troublesome?